Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 306ccd9d authored by Eric Kooistra's avatar Eric Kooistra
Browse files

Updated git review process.

parent 4d3f32f1
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ export SVN=${HOME}/svnroot/UniBoard_FP7
*******************************************************************************
* GIT workflow
* GIT references
*******************************************************************************
difftool ?
......@@ -202,13 +202,37 @@ git status
# delete branch and fetch npstream if the pull request was accepted
git remote remove <remote name> # remove a remote repo
Review process using Gitlab and Git
* Jira ticket defines the work to be done
* coder works on branch with Jira ticket number
* manually run regression test to test the changes (for Casacore SW the merge
request makes github automatically issue a regression test in the cloud)
* coder does merge request to reviewer
*******************************************************************************
* GIT workflow and review process using Gitlab
*******************************************************************************
We identify two persons in this process:
- the coder
- the reviewer
* Jira ticket defines the work to be done, e.g. L2SDP-26
* Coder works on branch with Jira ticket number as branch name
git checkout master # start on up to date master branch
git pull
git branch L2SDP-26 # creat branch using Jira ticket number
git branch # show branches
git checkout L2SDP-26 # change working tree and stage area to branch
* Work on branch using git add, commit and push
* Manually run regression test to test the changes (for Casacore SW the merge
request makes github automatically issue a regression test in the cloud, for
FW we need to run the relevant testbenches manually. It is not necessary to
rerun the entire FW regression test, it is sufficient to only run the
regression test for the HDL libraries that were modified and the HDL
libraries that could be impacted by the modification)
* Push the branch to the central repository at gitlab
git push -u origin L2SDP-26 # first time to declare the branch at the remote
* Coder does merge request to reviewer using the central Gitlab GUI
* gitlab will warn if the branch will lead to a merge conflict, the coder then
first has to fix the merge conflict by merging the master to the branch:
The merge can use merging or rebasing, Ger typically uses merging. On local
......@@ -216,28 +240,30 @@ Review process using Gitlab and Git
git checkout master
git pull
git checkout stat-313
git checkout L2SDP-26
git merge master
git status # to see merge conflicts, edit file to solve merge conflict
git add file
git commit
git push
* reviewer reviews the code per line and in general comments in gitlab GUI,
so no need to pull the branch locally
* Use 'Open in Web IDE' button to see max about 10 changes, Use 'Changes' menu
to see all changes. Green is new file, orange is change file, + is new lines
- is removed lines.
* coder does updates on branch until both coder and reviewer are ok, they are
* In gitlab do merge request to reviewer
* Reviewer reviews the code per line or in general comments in gitlab GUI,
so reviewer does not need to pull the branch locally and also does not need
to rerun the regression test.
* Use 'Open in Web IDE' button in gitlab GUI to see max about 10 changes,
use 'Changes' menu on same page to see all changes. Green is new file,
orange is change file, + is new lines - is removed lines.
* Coder does updates on branch until both coder and reviewer are ok, they are
notified by gitlab
* when review is done then the reviewer does the merge.
* the merge automatically deletes the branch (if selected to do so in gitlab)
* When review is done then the reviewer does the merge.
* The merge automatically deletes the branch (if selected to do so in gitlab)
locally the coder manually needs to delete the branch:
git branch
git checkout master
git status
git branch -d stat-313
git branch -d L2SDP-26
git status
* Use Jira tag in commit message to have link between GIT and Jira. The link
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment