Respond to feedback from Stelios Voutsinas

contents/6-future.tex

@@ -53,13 +53,13 @@ The \pgls{ESAP} Open Source Project will work closely as part of the future \gls
 It is impossible to enumerate all of them here; indeed, to attempt to do so would be undesirable, as it is necessary and appropriate for the directions of development to continue to evolve as requirements change and new opportunities emerge.
 Here, however, we suggest a number of goals which follow logically from the work presented in this document, and which describe a compelling case for the future.
 
-\subsubsection{Containerized Interactive Analysis Tooling}
+\subsubsection{More Flexible Interactive Analysis Systems}
 \label{sec:future:ida}
 
 As described in \cref{sec:delivered:ida}, currently interactive analysis in the \gls{ESAP} environment is based around Jupyter notebooks.
 While notebooks are currently popular and widespread, other tools are available and may be more appropriate in some circumstances.
 This can be conveniently achieved by including generic capabilities for executing containerized analysis tools.
-This would open a wider selection of software from the \gls{OSSR} for use through \gls{ESAP}.
+This would open a wider selection of software from the \gls{OSSR} for use through \gls{ESAP}, including making it possible to run graphical “desktop” applications.
 
 Within the context of \gls{ESCAPE} \gls{WP}5 substantial effort has been made in exploring this model using the Rosetta platform \autocite{2022A&C....4100648R}; a logical next step would be to apply the lessons learned and technologies developed there within \gls{ESAP} itself.
 

main.tex

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 \setDocTitle{Final Assessment of the Performance of the Science Platform Prototype}
 \setWorkPackage{WP5, ESFRI Science Analysis Platform}
 \setLeadAuthor{John D. Swinbank (ASTRON)}
-\setOtherAuthors{James Collinson (SKAO)}
+\setOtherAuthors{James Collinson (SKAO), Stelios Voutsinas (U.~Edinburgh)}
 \setDueDate{2022-11-30}
 \setDueMonth{M46}