Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit d64cfcd6 authored by Eric Kooistra's avatar Eric Kooistra
Browse files

Clarify type 2 (advances) polyphase and Transposed Direct form.

parent 14c18009
No related branches found
No related tags found
1 merge request!419Resolve RTSD-265
Pipeline #88533 passed
......@@ -1269,9 +1269,15 @@ c) s-plane and z-plane
where:
rp[n] = h(Qn - p), -p for clockwise with advances z^(+1)
Rq(z) = E_{Q-1-p}(z), so flipud phases, but keep coefficient order
Rp(z) = E_{Q-1-p}(z), so flipud Eq phases, but keep coefficient order
per phase
??? Is Type II polyphase same as Transposed Direct Form ???, because both still
implement H(z), they only yield different implementation structures. For Type 1
and Direct-Form the delay line goes from top to bottom in drawings. For Type 2
and Transposed we also want to draw the delay line from top to bottom (Fig 4.3.4,
Fig 4.3.11, Fig 4.5.6), but then we need to flipud the Eq phases.
. Phase q of h(n) with Q - 1 zeros, so [VAIDYANATHAN Fig 4.3.1]:
h[n] --> z^(-q) --> Q:1 --> eq[n]
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment