Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
LOFAR
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Wiki
Jira issues
Open Jira
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Locked files
Deploy
Releases
Package registry
Container registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
Repository analytics
Code review analytics
Insights
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
RadioObservatory
LOFAR
Commits
51c40cd1
Commit
51c40cd1
authored
15 years ago
by
Marcel Loose
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Bug 1310: Updated TODO list
parent
5c854993
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Show whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
CMake/TODO
+10
-10
10 additions, 10 deletions
CMake/TODO
with
10 additions
and
10 deletions
CMake/TODO
+
10
−
10
View file @
51c40cd1
...
...
@@ -13,6 +13,16 @@
* Python package are not yet part of the CMake build.
* In order for SubSystem build to succeed, it is necessary that meta-packages
can be used as a real target -- so that you can "make LCS" to build all LCS
packages -- much like the lofarconf.in file do in the Autotools environment.
Specifying the packages as dependencies using lofar_add_package() will
not work, because then these packages cannot be optional. Maybe we should
change the semantics of lofar_add_package() to something that is now
handled by lofar_add_subdirectory(); and have a new macro, e.g.
set_package_dependencies(), that can be used to define the actual package
dependencies.
* Define ${PROJECT_NAME}_LINK_LIBRARIES in LofarAddPackage.cmake, which can
then be used by lofar_add_library() and lofar_add_executable() in
LofarMacros.cmake. This avoids the need to create a "dummy" project library,
...
...
@@ -46,13 +56,3 @@
* Turn makeversion into a real CMake macro and merge it with
LofarPackageVersion. Generate the Package__Version.{h,cc} files in the
binary directory, instead of the source directory.
* It would be nice if a meta-package could be used as a real target -- so that
you could for example say "make LCS" to build all LCS packages -- much like
the lofarconf.in file do in the Autotools environment.
Specifying the packages as dependencies using lofar_add_package() will
not work, because then these packages cannot be optional. Maybe we should
change the semantics of lofar_add_package() to something that is now
handled by lofar_add_subdirectory(); and have a new macro, e.g.
set_package_dependencies(), that can be used to define the actual package
dependencies.
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment