Prefactor CWL produced one less MS than 3.x
There are 24 MS produced:
L343256_121MHz_uv_pre-cal.ms L343256_146MHz_uv_pre-cal.ms
L343256_123MHz_uv_pre-cal.ms L343256_148MHz_uv_pre-cal.ms
L343256_125MHz_uv_pre-cal.ms L343256_150MHz_uv_pre-cal.ms
L343256_127MHz_uv_pre-cal.ms L343256_152MHz_uv_pre-cal.ms
L343256_129MHz_uv_pre-cal.ms L343256_154MHz_uv_pre-cal.ms
L343256_130MHz_uv_pre-cal.ms L343256_156MHz_uv_pre-cal.ms
L343256_132MHz_uv_pre-cal.ms L343256_158MHz_uv_pre-cal.ms
L343256_134MHz_uv_pre-cal.ms L343256_160MHz_uv_pre-cal.ms
L343256_136MHz_uv_pre-cal.ms L343256_162MHz_uv_pre-cal.ms
L343256_138MHz_uv_pre-cal.ms L343256_164MHz_uv_pre-cal.ms
L343256_140MHz_uv_pre-cal.ms L343256_166MHz_uv_pre-cal.ms
L343256_142MHz_uv_pre-cal.ms
L343256_144MHz_uv_pre-cal.ms
Prefactor 3 produced 25 for the same filed. Is it OK? Will I get maps of the same quality in DDF?
Edited by Alex Kurek