diff --git a/applications/lofar2/libraries/sdp/src/vhdl/sdp_bdo_pkg.vhd b/applications/lofar2/libraries/sdp/src/vhdl/sdp_bdo_pkg.vhd
index 33df8e23bce60049b8e93a075628e96df6a7e400..d19cf03a6bc05de9ef2f36ef7f76b668869b5d9e 100644
--- a/applications/lofar2/libraries/sdp/src/vhdl/sdp_bdo_pkg.vhd
+++ b/applications/lofar2/libraries/sdp/src/vhdl/sdp_bdo_pkg.vhd
@@ -59,16 +59,12 @@ package sdp_bdo_pkg is
   -- nof_destinations > 1 and how many block RAM resources are available for
   -- the reordering. Therefore c_sdp_bdo_reorder_nof_blocks_max = 16 is a
   -- suitable compromise value.
-  -- Conclusion:
+  -- Conclusion (14 feb 2024):
   -- . Choose c_sdp_bdo_reorder_nof_blocks_max = 4 to save block RAM resources,
   --   and because it is acceptable to have smaller packets in case of more
   --   than 4 destinations. Note that the reorder buffer is dual page.
   -- . Choose nof_bdo_destinations_max = 8 in design revision, because it is
-  --   enough for CEP and to save logic resources and to ease timing closure.
-  -- Remark:
-  -- . The c_sdp_bdo_reorder_nof_blocks_max must be <=
-  --   nof_bdo_destinations_max, because otherwise this probably caused
-  --   Quartus synthesis to yield an segmentation error.
+  --   enough for CEP, and to save logic resources and to ease timing closure.
   constant c_sdp_bdo_reorder_nof_blocks_max : natural := 4;
   constant c_sdp_bdo_reorder_nof_blocks_w   : natural := ceil_log2(c_sdp_bdo_reorder_nof_blocks_max + 1);
   constant c_sdp_bdo_reorder_nof_ch_max     : natural := c_sdp_bdo_reorder_nof_blocks_max *